Thank you for helping to keep GamingOnLinux civil and safe!
Please tell us why you're reporting this content. Please note we store your IP address for all reports to help prevent spam and abuse. You can also email any complaints to: [email protected].
- Survive an elevator trying to eat you in co-op horror KLETKA when it releases February 19
- Draft code submitted to KDE Plasma turns it into a full VR desktop
- Proton Experimental brings updates for MonoGame, Rockstar Launcher and more
- Valve tweak Steam AI disclosure form for developers to clarify it's for content consumed by players
- No Rest for the Wicked co-op update lands on January 22 and it hit a big sales milestone
- > See more over 30 days here
- Casual/Social places for developer chatter
- simplyseven - Will you buy the new Steam Frame?
- eev - One-time logout
- Liam Dawe - Away later this week...
- Liam Dawe - Weekend Players' Club 2026-01-16
- grigi - See more posts
How to setup OpenMW for modern Morrowind on Linux / SteamOS and Steam Deck
How to install Hollow Knight: Silksong mods on Linux, SteamOS and Steam Deck
These rules make sense.
Well, yes.The hate against all AI usage without distinction between usage as a tool and usage to replace people is something I just mostly ignore nowadays. As do most people, thankfully.
It is mostly Reddit-level & social media brainrot and can be discarded. Eventually people on those platforms move on to the next thing to hate on, as they always do.
You'd have to enforce open sourcing everything and even THEN you could almost never be certain.
Unenforceable rules are pointless.
You are mixing different things here.
Almost nobody got any money for having their "thing" being used for AI training. At least coding-wise there were/are "AI trainers" - it is unclear to me how much of a share those have nowadays, but to my knowledge such a thing does not exist for artists or musicians.
So if anything, coders have it (a little bit) better here.
Practically all of these are examples of misuse and the current Wild West lawlessness state of the area.
Not arguments against AI use itself.
You are right about the bubble, of course, but that is just the normal hype cycle we've seen with all bigger technologies (just think of the internet & dotcom bubble).
What matters now really doesn't matter as much as what will happen after the bubble pops, which I assume will be a much more regulated and purpose-driven state (again, just like with the dotcom bubble).
I'd call it being level-headed and informed - as opposed to panic mongering apocalyptic nonsense and giving in to such.